News Clipping

Browse the latest AEDS news in this page
Showing 9745 to 9752 of 9849
  • Oil & Gas
25 October 2018

 – 

  • Indonesia

JAKARTA, Oct 24 (Reuters) – Indonesia’s state-owned energy company Pertamina is looking to reduce spending of foreign exchange in U.S. dollars by seeking crude oil purchases in other currencies, a senior company official told Reuters on Wednesday.

“The (Integrated Supply Chain unit), as executor of the tender, has requested to use other currencies apart from U.S. dollars, including rupiah,” Basuki Trikora Putra, Pertamina’s director of corporate marketing, told Reuters.

“It’s in response to current conditions to reduce spending of foreign exchange in U.S. dollars.”

The rupiah hovered on Wednesday near its weakest since the Asian financial crisis of 1998, having fallen nearly 12 percent this year against the dollar. It is one of the worst performers among emerging Asian currencies so far in 2018.

Putra’s comments come a day after Pertamina sought to buy crude oil for delivery in the first quarter of 2019 using currencies other than the U.S. dollar, according to a tender document reviewed by Reuters this week.

The move is seen as a tool for Jakarta to curb a widening current account deficit caused by rising oil prices and as it tries to keep Indonesia’s currency afloat.

Pertamina is looking to buy up to 5.7 million barrels of low-sulphur crude from West Africa, Malaysia, Vietnam or Brunei, priced in currencies such as the euro, Indonesian rupiah, Chinese yuan, Japanese yen or the Saudi Arabia’s riyal. (Reporting by Wilda Asmarini; Writing by Jessica Jaganathan; Editing by Tom Hogue)

  • Renewables
25 October 2018

 – 

  • Vietnam
Risen Energy said that it had won a bid for the NHI HA 50MW PV project in Ninh Thuan will be owned by Vietnam-based shopping mall and hotel developer, Bitexco Group’s subsidiary Thap Cham Solar. Image: Risen Energy

Major China-based PV manufacturer Risen Energy has secured its third recent PV power plant project in Vietnam, bringing its tally to over 160MW.

Risen Energy said that it had won a bid for the NHI HA 50MW PV project in Ninh Thuan will be owned by Vietnam-based shopping mall and hotel developer, Bitexco Group’s subsidiary Thap Cham Solar.
Risen Energy is using its high-efficiency modules and 5-busbar 1500V high voltage modules for the facility in its role as the assigned EPC contractor.

Construction was said to have started on the facility on October 1 and is expected to generate an average annual power of 81,429MWh, on completion.

The electricity generated by the project will be provided to EVN, the Vietnamese state grid.

  • Energy Economy
  • Renewables
25 October 2018

 – 

  • Vietnam
Associate Professor Gustav Martinsson talks with Việt Nam’s press. – VNS Photo Khoa Thư

Investing in renewable energy is an emerging trend in Việt Nam in response to worsening environmental destruction and the gradual disappearance of essential livelihoods. Việt Nam News talks with Gustav Martinsson, associate professor of financial economics at the Sweden Royal Institute of Technology, about green finance and international experiences that show how Việt Nam’s Government can catch the new wave.

What do you think is the most important issue when talking about the transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy?

I think the most important thing is a structural problem: we don’t put a price on carbon. There is a need for political action, meaning decision makers must do what they can to fix this problem so that companies cannot make profit from industries that release a lot of carbon to the atmosphere.

Sweden’s transition to renewable energy mirrors what Việt Nam is trying to do. What do you think is the greatest challenge to this project?

The biggest challenge to me is securing political will from decision makers. Companies and organisations are not going to want this change. What is good for the climate in the long run might be against their short term interests and profits. Therefore, you should be prepared for that.

The Government can issue some regulations or taxes but then you will need to have formal mechanisms to accelerate that change and try to make it through dialogue.

In transitioning into renewable energy, there are two parts to the job. The first is to encourage investment in renewables and the second is creating a mechanism to punish or discourage dirty fuels. What is your comment on that?

I agree that we should encourage investment in renewable energy.

However, I would not say that you should do one first and then the other. There is actually new interesting research coming out on exactly how to do the combination. I think the standard now is to think about the goal. Because the market for renewable energy is now small, you will need subsidies to make it more profitable for investors to invest there, before turning to hardline measures with taxes and punishment.

You can first start with subsidising renewable energy and not punishing the use of carbon. The combination can be a little bit different depending on what the country sets up.

At the moment, coal-fire plants still supply a large part of Việt Nam’s energy, though they create many environmental issues. What do you think of the status quo?

Coal is the number one enemy to the environment. And I think we should keep in mind that it is not that cheap. It has to be subsidised currently. Therefore, cutting off subsidies will make coal less competitive. On the other hand, we need something to replace coal. Globally, renewable energy is becoming cheaper and more competitive compared to coal. It is an opportunity for us to enact the combination, both growing renewables and reducing greenhouse emissions.

What advantages does Việt Nam have in its green energy transition compared to Sweden?

In terms of green energy, Sweden has no one to follow and we have to invent ourselves.

Therefore, I think one of the biggest advantages that countries like Việt Nam should focus on is looking at the best practical examples of how to make the change.

Energy policies are needed but I think you should build a policy framework in which renewable energy versus coal, for example, is put into consideration.

Because the incentive system is crucial. If you can make profit from coal, you will keep doing it unless profit is higher for renewable energy.

Sweden destroyed ourselves with air pollution as we did not know better at the time. It means that you do not need to make the same mistake Sweden did and you can avoid that by starting to implement green solutions early on.

How should the Government perform its monitoring role in the green transition?

I think the government embraces the power of making decisions. We should be very careful in making policy.

Taxing is not for forbidding, but also about creating force for transition. We could forbid the use of carbon directly but we need energy to sustain and develop the economy.

Also, there are a lot of lobbying and interest groups that do not want the transitions to happen. The problem is not unique to Việt Nam.

Sweden had industries depending heavily on fossil fuel in the past but we had policies to change it. In the 70s, the oil price was increasing and turned out to be very expensive then we had to look elsewhere for alternatives. Sweden together with other countries initiated a carbon tax in 1991. That is how companies change; they have to adapt when the cost go up.

The decision came from the government as the private sectors did not want it, at all. But they have to adapt to the regulations and find new solutions to make money.

To ensure a just transition to green energy, companies have to be transparent about their impacts on the environment. How can Việt Nam’s Government improve data disclosure?

It is relatively new and in Sweden, the government puts a lot of pressure to have companies show information. Exactly how that works is specific to each country. In my country, we have a long tradition for information sharing so companies’ reports of financial issues are very comprehensive already and we have a very high trust in the number in there. If the information is not true, the company will be punished by law. If we have the culture of data disclosure it will be easier but there is one global initiative called the Climate Taskforce whose mission is to provide governments with frameworks of how data disclosure is performed. – VNS

  • Electricity/Power Grid
  • Oil & Gas
25 October 2018

 – 

  • Myanmar

It is expected to generate 1,500GWh of power and support the power needs of 5.3 million people.

Sembcorp Industries’ 225MW gas-fired Sembcorp Myingyan Independent Power Plant (IPP) in Mandalay, Myanmar, has started full commercial operation following its first phase operation in May 2018.

According to an announcement, the $300m plant uses combined-cycle gas turbine technology that allows it to maximise power output whilst minimising emissions.

The facility will generate around 1,500GWh of power for supply to Myanmar’s Electric Power Generation Enterprise (EPGE), which is expected to meet the power needs of around 5.3 million people.

A long-term power purchase agreement with Myanmar’s Ministry of Electricity and Energy allows Sembcorp Myingyan Power Company to build and operate the power plant for 22 years, after which the facility will be transferred to the Myanmar government.

Asian Development Bank, Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, Clifford Capital, DBS Bank, DZ Bank, International Finance Corporation, and Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation supported Sembcorp in the funding of this project.

  • Renewables
25 October 2018

 – 

  • Philippines

NORZAGARAY – In battling the timber poachers who roam the thick Sierra Madre forests near his home, Larry Garaes has found a new ally: solar panels.

With solar chargers, the radios he and other forest rangers rely on no longer run out of power on multi-day operations in the mountains, he said.

“Communication between rangers is a lot better. Now, we can catch the poachers while they are in the act because we can coordinate our moves quietly without resorting to shouting at the next ranger – unlike before,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Access to clean energy is bringing a range of unexpected benefits around the world. On the longest mountain range in the Philippines, those benefits include better forest protection – and power for tribal people who once lacked it.

More than 2 million households – or about 10 percent of all households – in the Philippines lack electricity, according to a 2017 report by the country’s Department of Energy.

About three quarters are in remote rural locations, in a country spread over thousands of islands, according to the Small Power Utilities Group (SPUG), which is trying to get them connected.

Because bringing the national grid power to many of those people is not cost effective, the state National Power Corporation has charged SPUG with setting up and running small power plants in these areas.

So far 327 such plants have been established, according to the National Power Corporation.

Government plans call for 100 percent electrification of the country by 2022.

“Government has to do its work to connect all those areas that are not yet connected to the grid,” said Edmundo Veloso Jr., the head of the National Power Corporation’s SPUG unit.

But all but one of the new generation plants use diesel fuel, he said – even though transport of fuel can be a big problem in remote areas.

Diesel is “the fastest and the only technology available at the moment for off-grid areas. Diesel is still the cheapest in terms of capital outlay,” he said.

TAPPING THE SUN

In Garaes’ community, however, in Bulacan province in the northern Philippines, 2 solar micro-grids are providing the community’s first power.

They were put in place last December by the Forest Foundation Philippines, a non-governmental organisation that aims to improve forest protection, and the Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology (CREST), a Quezon City-based organisation focused on expanding use of clean power.

While the new grid was primarily set up to help members of the local Dumagat ethnic group police the forests, it also supplies power free of charge to common areas of the village of 36 families, including a study hall and communal kitchens.

The forest rangers and other members of the community have been trained to troubleshoot and maintain the system, CREST officials said.

“In the past we would need to walk almost two kilometers to the nearest village where there is electricity to charge our radios and cellphones for a fee,” Garaes said. “That was a burden to us.”

Such solar micro-grids could fill gaps in providing electricity to many remote areas of the Philippines as they are cheap to operate – and don’t face the fuel transport issue of diesel-run plants, said Sara Ahmed, an energy analyst for the US-based Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.

“It’s not economically viable to transfer power from one (place) to another if the demand is not high. That’s why far-flung areas don’t get power,” Ahmed said.

“This is where micro-grids come in. There is no need to build transmission lines and wires. You can have power right there and then. You save a lot of money.”

In Garaes’ village, each micro-grid produces 1 kilowatt of electricity – enough to provide lights in the communal kitchen, along village pathways, in the classroom and for a television set. Building the grid cost about $3,000, according to CREST officials.

Urbano Mendiola Jr., vice president for corporate affairs at the National Power Corporation, said his agency was considering installing hybrid power plants that combine diesel and solar power in some remote areas.

A hybrid plant to power about 1,250 households costs about $985,000, he said, while a diesel-only plant costs about $425,000.

But while hybrid plants are more expensive to set up at the moment, they bring cost savings in the long run because energy from the sun is free, he said.

He said the company is not setting up solar-only plants in remote areas at the moment because of the cost of the batteries needed to store solar power and provide energy at night.

Rural off-grid power plants in the Philippines are funded by the government and by a small surcharge on the electrical bills of grid power users, aimed at bringing the cost of power for rural users closer in line with that in urban areas.

Ahmed said that tapping the full potential of renewable energy would require a sea-change in the views of officials tasked with providing energy.

Currently they say diesel is the most affordable option. But “diesel is not affordable… When they say it’s cheaper, they only mean upfront,” she said.

“If you look at wind and solar, the prices have dramatically gone down,” Ahmed said. “SPUG needs to update itself with the technology”.

  • Electricity/Power Grid
  • Oil & Gas
25 October 2018

 – 

  • Vietnam

HÀ NỘI — The building of new thermopower plants has recently become a cause célèbre in the country as economic demands and environmental concerns face off, especially with a number of localities rejecting central Government-approved plants.

Việt Nam needs an enormous amount of energy to feed one of the fastest growing economies in the world, and coal-fired thermopower plants are usually favoured by governments as the most affordable option that can guarantee a cheap supply of electricity, however, environmentalists and the public have been arguing that the perceived ‘low costs’ have not accounted for costly long-term consequences that these plants dealt to the environment and people’s health.

According to the revised National Power Development Master Plan VII (for the period 2016-30), the installed capacity of the whole coal-fired power of the country would reach 55,300MW by 2030, with 14,600MW supplied by 11 projects in the Mekong Delta region.

Most recently, the low-lying coastal province of Long An received attention as the local government decided late in September that they would ask the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MoIT) to not go through with two coal-fired thermopower plants in the province, opting to build a US$5 billion thermopower plant run on liquified natural gas (LNG), which supposedly produces less pollution and greenhouse gases, instead.

According to the approved master plan, a power plant complex would be underway in Long Hựu Đông Commune in Cần Đước District, comprising two coal-fired plants slated to go into operation in 2025 and 2028, respectively, with a total capacity of nearly 3,000MW.

The complex is expected to generate 17 billion kWh a year, helping to ensure electricity demands for socio-economic development in the province as well as its southern neighbours – where the State-run Việt Nam Electricity (EVN) said that delayed coal-fired projects might lead to crippling power shortages in 2021-23 and potentially 2025.

However, Trần Văn Cần, Chairman of Long An People’s Committee said that after serious discussion with experts, scientists and other agencies regarding the environmental aspects of the power plan, the province had decided that coal-fired plants would not be in its best interests.

Cần said that three investors – one Vietnamese, one South Korean and one Thai – had already contacted the People’s Committee about building an LNG power plant at the site originally planned for thermopower plants.

Cautious choice

According to the MoIT, in the power development master plan, Việt Nam’s sources of power are identified as hydropower, thermopower (coal-based or gas-based), renewable energy, nuclear energy and imported energy.

With Việt Nam’s commercial electricity demands for 2017 at 174 billion kWh and three times as much, 500 billion kWh, in 2030, the electricity sector would be hard-pressed to ensure sufficient supply, while it needs to make sure that the price is in line with what people and businesses can reasonably pay, at the same time, power production activities must not harm the environment.

According to Lê Văn Lực, deputy head of the MoIT’s Electricity and Renewable Energy Authority, Việt Nam’s most viable source of energy is hydropower, however, the 285-strong network of hydroelectric power plants stationed across the country – mostly small- and medium-scaled – have already exhausted their potential.

As much as 16-17 per cent of the country’s energy would be supplied by LNG-fueled thermal power plants, Lực said, but starting from 2019-20, the country would need to find supplemental sources of gas as the natural reserves are running out.

The price of electricity generated from LNG projects are also higher, averaging VNĐ2,300-2,500 per kWh, with imported units reaching around the same (10 US cents/kWh), 1.5 times the price of thermal electricity and highly sensitive to the global market’s fluctuations, according to Lực.

Renewable energy in Việt Nam is still at a nascent stage, with most solar and wind power projects clustered in the southern provinces of Ninh Thuận or Bình Thuận. In addition, they cannot guarantee a stable supply as they are heavily reliant on weather conditions, thus, needing energy storage and battery technology, while Việt Nam is always hungry for energy, with dismissible difference in demands during rush hour/normal hour or night/day.

The price of electricity from renewable energy is also quite high.

According to Trương Duy Nghĩa, President of Việt Nam’s Association for Thermal Science and Technology, the building of new thermal power plants in the southern region is critical for its development.

The cost of thermal power is currently 7 cents/kWh, the lowest behind hydropower, with modest investment at $1.5/kWh and great capacity generation.

In the meantime, clean sources of energy are too pricey to dominate the energy scene.

“Similarly, Việt Nam would need to import liquefied natural gas, and then we’d have to worry about transport lines, reservoirs and storage of the gas, all of this would make electricity derived from LNG less competitive in terms of price compared to coal-fired,” Nghĩa added.

The environmental concerns surrounding coal-based thermal power plants involved the ash they generated and the sources of coal they use.

However, with the latest technology, thermal power plants with optimal operation could efficiently burn the coal entirely and sufficiently treat pollutants like SO2 or CO2, Chairman of the Việt Nam Energy Association, Trần Viết Ngãi, told Vietnam News Agency.

The ash and slag are already used to produce non-fired bricks at an affordable cost, with companies in the northern province of Bắc Ninh capable of handling more than the waste amount produced by the coal power plant in the province already, according to Ngãi.

He also affirmed that thermal power, especially coal-fired, would continue to be the mainstay of the national power system.

“The association sees that across Việt Nam, coal-fired power plants’ installed capacity in the planning is just 20,000MW, this number could be increased to 45,000-50,000MW and still pale in comparison to other countries,” Ngãi said, but adding that the amount of coal that the country would need to import – 200 million tonnes by 2030 – is a problem that needs serious discussion.

Regarding the Long An power plan, MoIT said that since there had been no research conducted to ensure the uninterrupted transport of natural gas to the intended LNG power plant’s location, it could not approve the province’s alternative plan.

However, the authorities, including MoIT officials, have expressed “respect for Long An Province Party committee and people’s decision.”

“The ministry agrees with the idea that economic development should not be pursued at the expense of the environment. Environment impacts would weigh heavily in the consideration of the power plant project,” Lực from MoIT said, adding that once the province decides on a capable investor, it would report to the Government on the revised power plan.

Similarly, earlier in 2018, the Mekong Delta province of Bạc Liêu asked to remove the national master plan’s coal thermal plants out of its planning and the decision was approved by the Government.

The province then allowed a US-based investor to set up a $4 billion natural gas thermal plant with a capacity of 3,500KW, which is scheduled to begin operations in early 2020. — VNS

  • Renewables
25 October 2018

 – 

  • ASEAN

Nation’s energy policy shifts from coal to advanced reactors

Twenty years ago, China had just three nuclear power reactors. Today, it has 38, with 19 more under construction.

The country accounts for more than half the new nuclear power investment globally and is expected by 2030 to pass the United States, which has led the world in nuclear power generation for half a century.

After decades of large-scale use of fossil fuels to produce energy, China has recognized the impact this has had on the environment and the health of its people.

Economic losses due to pollution account for almost 6 percent of GDP, according to World Bank estimates.

Today, there is a renewed push for cleaner, greener energy sources.

All aspects of China’s nuclear power industry – including design, construction, technologies, maintenance, management, security, investment, returns and future projections – are receiving renewed attention.

He Yu, chairman of China General Nuclear Power Corp, has said that China should build four to six nuclear reactors annually to ensure the installed capacity of nuclear power reaches at least 150 gigawatts by 2030.

China’s nuclear power program was put on hold after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan in 2011, with approvals for new nuclear plants suspended and a nationwide safety review launched after the incident.

He said last year that nuclear energy plays an irreplaceable role in China’s energy security and energy structure optimization, while it will also help to reduce air pollution caused by coal-fired power generation.

The country added about 8 gW of nuclear power capacity in 2016, boosting its installed capacity to about 34 gW, according to BMI Research, a provider of macroeconomic, industry and financial market analysis.

The government has pledged that renewable energy will play an integral role in the push for greener growth, boosting the share of nonfossil energy to 15 percent by 2020 and 20 percent by 2030, with coal consumption reduced to 62 percent of energy use by 2020.

China published a nuclear industry white paper in 2016, detailing policies regarding nuclear emergency preparedness and highlighting a “rational, coordinated and balanced” approach to nuclear security.

The country said it had “the most advanced technology and most stringent standards” to ensure the safe and efficient development of nuclear power.

While developing nuclear power projects in the domestic market, China is actively exploring export markets for its advanced equipment in the sector.

It will profoundly influence what the rest of the world believes about nuclear power and the nuclear fuel cycle, according to Mark Hibbs, a senior fellow with the Carnegie Nuclear Policy Program in Germany.

He believes China aims to move from conventional nuclear power reactors to a “fully closed nuclear fuel cycle based on fast breeder reactors, spent fuel reprocessing and the use of recycled plutonium fuel”.

“If China fails, it will reinforce conventional thinking in some countries that nuclear fission is a transitional energy technology likely to be replaced this century by other sources,” he stated in his new report “The Future of Nuclear Power in China”.

“If China succeeds, prevailing low expectations for nuclear power may instead be dramatically revised.”

If that is the case, Hibbs said other countries may follow in projecting that nuclear power will be sustainable for centuries and that the risks associated with an industrial-scale “plutonium economy” are socially, economically, environmentally and politically acceptable.

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, China stands at the top of the list of expanding nuclear power countries, followed by Russia with seven reactors under construction, India with six and South Korea with three.

In terms of having the most reactors in operation, the United States leads, followed by France, Japan and China.

The IAEA said that while China is trying to curb its reliance on coal, which pollutes the air and is hard to transport from mines in the west and north of the country to the economically developed southeast coast, it is building most of its reactors along this coast.

“With nuclear, it plans to increase energy security, lower its reliance on coal and oil, and limit carbon dioxide emissions while keeping up its economic growth,” the IAEA said.

In June, three significant announcements were made involving China’s nuclear power sector.

The first was on June 8, when China National Nuclear Power and Russian state nuclear company Rosatom signed a multibillion-dollar agreement, the biggest nuclear energy deal between the two countries for more than a decade.

Under the $3.62 billion deal, Russia will build four new-generation Water-Water Energetic Reactors – two at the Xudabao power plant in Northeast China’s Liaoning province, and the other two at Tianwan in the eastern province of Jiangsu.

Analysts say Tianwan is regarded as a testing ground for Russian nuclear technology and that the latest deal confirms Beijing’s ongoing commitment to a bilateral energy partnership in which Russian technology provides a springboard for a state-of-the-art nuclear industry in China.

On June 29, the world’s first EPR, formerly known as the European Pressurized Reactor, in Taishan, South China’s Guangdong province, was successfully connected to the national grid. This was followed next day by the announcement that Westinghouse’s Sanmen Nuclear Power Plant in the eastern province of Zhejiang had been successfully connected to the grid.

Jonathan Cobb, senior communication manager with the World Nuclear Association in London, said coal still generates about 70 percent of China’s electricity.

“China’s energy policy seeks to shift away from such high reliance on coal and build more nuclear generation, as well as other low-carbon generation sources,” he said.

“This is not only as part of a long-term plan to control greenhouse gas emissions, but also to reduce the terrible health impacts of air pollution experienced today from fossil fuels.”

With demand for electricity still growing and such a large capacity of coal-fired generation already in place, it is likely China will still use coal for a substantial proportion of its electricity generation for several decades to come, Cobb said.

He added that increasing the use of nuclear power in place of coal will have a substantial positive benefit on the environment.

“Each gigawatt of nuclear capacity built in place of coal – about the size of one new nuclear power plant – will avoid the emission of around 8 million tons of carbon dioxide each year, as well as sulfur and nitrogen oxides and particulates.

“This will help the environment in the long term and immediately improve people’s health due to the reduction in air pollution,” he said.

However, according to Cobb, China relies on coal for much of its electricity generation, and meeting its growing demand for electricity and phasing out coal requires time and a long-term program of new nuclear building.

Trevor Findlay, a senior research fellow at the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne, said that if China is to meet its greenhouse gas commitments under the Paris Agreement and more demanding future agreements, it will need nuclear energy in its energy mix, especially if it is to reduce its reliance on coal.

“But as in other countries, nuclear is likely to only ever account for a relatively small percentage of China’s total energy production, mainly because of the cost of nuclear power plants compared to other sources of energy, such as natural gas, wind and solar,” Findlay said.

“China is certainly building more nuclear power plants than any other country, so to that extent it is leading the world,” he said.

Whether this leads to the deployment of advanced nuclear power technologies remains an unanswered question.

“China has been developing its own indigenous technologies, drawing on its experience with a wide variety of imported foreign models, as it does in many other high technology sectors,” Findlay said.

“But to date, this has not resulted in any revolutionary advances. In the export market, it is competing with Russia, South Korea, Japan and France, and there is no guarantee that it will become the predominant supplier.”

Findlay added that on the issue of nuclear security and safety, “China needs to ensure that in undertaking such an unprecedented expansion of nuclear energy, the capacity of its nuclear regulatory authority, including the number and quality of its inspectors, keeps pace”.

Li Yanfei, energy economist with the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, said that while China does have its own nuclear technology, it needs to focus more on developing it.

Much of the nuclear power infrastructure built so far has used foreign technology, he said.

“Without a mature supply chain to support the building of nuclear reactors, it would be only a blueprint, no matter how good it appears in theory.”

  • Oil & Gas
19 October 2018

 – 

  • Myanmar

As the scramble for more power sources intensifies, focus has centered on tapping Myanmar’s gas fields to meet demand. But can the country afford its own gas?

Myanmar is under pressure to double its power production capacity to 6000 megawatts (MW) within the next two years, in order to meet rising demand. Several power generation projects, the most recent of which is the 225MW Sembcorp Myingyan combined-cycle gas plant, have commenced operations. Next month, a 40MW solar plant in Minbu is expected to come onstream.

The government is also negotiating terms for several power purchase agreements under which it will buy liquefied natural gas (LNG) to meet the bulk of Myanmar’s energy requirements. While official announcements have yet to be made on this front, insiders and analysts warn that the LNG option, which will involve costly infrastructure and complex logistical requirements, is unlikely to come cheap.

As the need to develop new sources of power becomes more urgent, focus has centered on tapping Myanmar’s own fields for gas to meet the country’s growing demand. Now, insiders say the government should take into account domestic needs when it opens up new gas fields next year.

Last month, a 40 metre column of gas was discovered at a depth of 4,820m at the Shwe Yee Htun-2 appraisal well in the A-6 gas block in southern Rakhine. The Shwe Yee Htun-2 discovery adds to the Shwe Yee Htun-1 and Pyi Thit-1 discoveries made in 2016 and 2017.

While France’s Total and Australia’s Woodside are also partners in block A-6 together with Myanmar’s MPRL E&P, “all of the gas produced at A-6 should be taken up by Myanmar for domestic use. We need to make arrangements to be able to buy the gas so that our economy can develop further,” said U Kyaw Kyaw Hlaing, chair of the Smart Group of Companies.

Myanmar is expected to produce 653,300 million standard cubic feet (MMscf) of gas from its four gas fields – Shwe, Zawtika, Yetagun and Yadana – in 2018-19, according to the Ministry of Planning and Finance. The fields are operated by international oil companies including France’s Total, South Korea’s Daewoo, Malaysia’s Petronas and PTTEP from Thailand.

However, most of the gas produced is immediately exported to Myanmar’s neighbours at an agreed price. For example, gas produced at the offshore Shwe and Zawtika fields is exported to China and Thailand under 30-year contracts.

This is because most of Myanmar’s gas contracts date back to the late 1990s, when the country was under US sanctions. At the time, cheap gas produced onshore was sufficient for domestic consumption, so the country resorted to selling the additional gas produced under long-term contracts for income.

But the country’s electricity requirements have since spiked, buoyed by demand from investors and businesses. Now, policy makers are considering channeling more Myanmar gas for domestic use.

Too costly

Yet, Myanmar lacks the funds and infrastructure needed to produce its own gas. According to the Ministry of Electricity and Energy (MOEE), each offshore drilling project is estimated to cost around K2 billion, a sum the country can ill-afford. It will also take years for gas to be commercially produced after it is discvoered.

Meanwhile, buying more of its own gas will involve complex negotiations. “The present arrangement of selling gas to foreign countries can be halted and the gas redistributed within the domestic sector. Renegotiations will of course have to be made with the contracted nations. All resources produced by our nation can be utilised. But how are we going to purchase it?” said U Zaw Aung, director general of the Department of Oil and Gas Planning, which is under the MOEE.

Moreover, gas is sold at a fixed price. If the government or private businesses want to purchase natural gas, they are obliged to pay the agreed price for the duration of the contract, failing which fines will be implemented. The length of the contract depends on the size of the field.

But that’s not the only issue. Myanmar derives a large proportion of its income from gas exports. In fact, most of the funds needed to build Nay Pyi Taw came from gas export revenues. In the future, the country will also need additional funds in areas such as education and healthcare.

“The country needs the money from gas exports. Moreover, income from other sectors is not as lucrative. If we start selling less gas to foreign countries and purchase more for domestic use, we would not have enough funds for the country,” U Zaw Aung said.

In 2017-18, Myanmar received more than US$3 billion for gas exports. During the six month interim period between April and September this year, gas export income amounted to more than US$1 billion, according to the Ministry of Commerce.

Domestic needs

Still, it is becoming increasingly obvious that Myanmar should harness more of its own gas for domestic consumption. “The international market price is fair. But domestically, the price can be reduced to some extent as there are less logistics costs involved,” said U Myat Thin Aung, chair for Hlaing Tharyar Industrial Zone.

U Than Tun, a retired director of the Myanmar Oil and Gas Enterprise (MOGE), agreed that the government should look into prioritising domestic needs. “If the current volume of electricity generated domestically cannot fulfill local demand, we need to take as much as we need from our national gas reserves,” he said, adding that exporting gas while importing other forms of energy to meet local demand is not an efficient use of state revenues.

Despite the country’s shortage of power, just a fraction of the gas produced is allocated for domestic consumption. Of the 1.7 billion cubic feet of natural gas it produces daily, Myanmar exports around 1.5 billion cubic feet, U Kyaw Thura, a geologist at MOGE, told the media in August. However, Myanmar also imports around 50,000 barrels of oil to meet demand, he said.

As such, the government should negotiate for a larger share of the gas produced when it invites international tenders for exploration and production at up to 31 new oil and gas fields next year.

User Dashboard

Back To ACE