THEY say good things come in pairs. This adage appears to be shaping up to be true in the case of Davao-based businessman Dennis Uy, who has partnered with two Chinese firms for big-ticket projects in the country.
Last month the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) declared Mindanao Islamic Telephone Co. Inc. of Uy and China Telecom as the country’s third telco player.
Now, another Uy-Chinese firm tie-up may soon secure the green light of the Duterte administration to embark on an ambitious power project with an initial cost of $2 billion.
This, after the Department of Energy (DOE) declared that it is determined to finish “very soon” its evaluation of the proposal of China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC) and partner Phoenix Petroleum Corp. for their planned liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal and power plant.
And “very soon,” energy officials say, may mean “in the next few days” at the most.
“We are rushing it and we want to make sure that the decision we are coming up [with] is the correct one,” said Energy Secretary Alfonso G. Cusi.
In fact, the energy secretary is expecting on his table a final report from the agency’s Centralized Review and Evaluation Committee (C-REC) on the application of Tanglawan Philippines LNG Inc., the registered joint-venture firm.
“Hopefully, toward the weekend I’ll have the report on my table and we will be able to make the decision next week,” Cusi said.
Should the partnership secure a permit from the DOE, it will be the second big-ticket contract to be awarded by this administration to Uy and a Chinese firm.
Tanglawan is among the 23 firms that expressed interest to put up an LNG hub in the Philippines. However, it is the only one that submitted an application to build an LNG hub.
In its application, Tanglawan is eyeing to build an LNG onshore terminal in Batangas with a capacity of 5 million metric tons per annum. It will also build a power plant with a capacity of 1,000 to 2,000 megawatts.
Philippines as LNG hub
The DOE is eyeing to make the Philippines Southeast Asia’s hub for LNG to ensure the continuity of power supply from natural gas-fired power plants in anticipation of the eventual depletion of the Malampaya gas field.
Currently, the Philippines only relies on the Malampaya gas field, where 98 percent of total production is used for power generation—supplying fuel to five natural gas plants in Batangas, namely, Ilijan, Santa Rita, San Lorenzo, San Gabriel and Avion with a total installed capacity of 3,211 MW that provide the electricity requirement of Luzon and even the Visayas.
“The Philippines has already failed in being the aviation hub despite our geographical advantage, also in maritime. This is a dream. We want to give it a shot,” Cusi said.
The LNG project is also vital to ensure the country’s energy security.
The energy chief also stressed that the long-planned import terminal will help temper electricity rates, especially when the Malampaya gas facility undergoes a scheduled maintenance shutdown.
Cusi said LNG can provide the demand from base-load, mid-merit and peaking requirements and can compete with other fuel sources that can address the least-cost optimal electricity from such demand centers.
“Around 3,200 MW of power is dependent on the natural gas and the LNG [terminal that] should have been done a long time ago because when the Malampaya undergoes maintenance shutdown, it’s costing…consumers a lot as we have power plants dependent on natural gas, which would have to switch to more expensive fuel adjustment,” he said. “We could have avoided that if we have our LNG terminal.”
PNOC role
The state-run Philippine National Oil Co. (PNOC) was once very active and vocal in its pursuit to put up its LNG facility with a partner.
But its search for a partner is taking too long and the DOE could no longer wait for PNOC to conclude its search.
According to DOE Undersecretary Donito Marcos, the PNOC may have “slowed down” with its process.
But according to Cusi, PNOC could still be a partner in this LNG project to be spearheaded by the CNOOC-Phoenix partnership, noting that it is important for the government to be present in such a big-ticket project.
“PNOC’s presence is important because it will represent the government. Its participation in the LNG project will be discussed among themselves so the decision lies among the stakeholders in this project,” explained Cusi.
First Gen’s LNG project
Another eager company in the LNG space is the Lopez-led First Gen Corp.
Even before the DOE announced its intention to transform the country into an LNG hub, First Gen has declared it will put up its own LNG terminal within the Lopez-led company’s power-generation complex in Batangas City.
It recently signed a joint development agreement (JDA) with Tokyo Gas Co. Ltd. to build the said LNG terminal.
Tokyo Gas will take a 20-percent participating interest in the LNG project and provide support in development work to achieve a final investment decision.
Upon reaching that decision under the JDA, the parties will enter into a definitive agreement to proceed with the construction of the project, First Gen said.
“We [First Gen and Tokyo Gas]both share the vision of the Department of Energy in the implementation of LNG projects in the Philippines. First Gen and Tokyo Gas intend to cooperate with all relevant stakeholders who share the same vision to participate in making LNG viable for the Philippines,” said First Gen President and COO Francis Giles B. Puno.
First Gen has around 2,000 MW in operating gas-powered plants, namely: the 1,000-MW Santa Rita power plant, the 500-MW San Lorenzo power plant, the 414-MW San Gabriel power plant and the 97-MW Avion power plant.
The DOE said it is not discouraging other firms from putting up their own LNG facility even if this will be located in Batangas, which is where Tanglawan’s planned LNG project would be put up. However, the agency has warned them of the risks involved since this may affect the project’s viability.
“Why sell the same thing in the same area? The sellers, of course, would want to ensure their investment will grow. To ensure that, they must have customers who will buy what they sell. This is where careful planning comes into play,” Marcos said.
LNG law
Lawmakers and the DOE are working together to craft a law on LNG that will include, among others, an improved energy mix meant to entice private-sector investment.
“We are now in the process of working with the DOE in coming up with a comprehensive LNG law that will become the ultimate framework of the LNG industry,” said Sen. Sherwin T. Gatchalian, chairman of the Senate Energy Committee.
He said a law is needed to “make sure the future of LNG will be viable and sustainable” because a department circular issued by the DOE may not be enough.
“The DOE is agreeable to the creation of a law because we don’t have a law now that governs LNG. It’s just a circular now. We will have a framework to regulate the importation of LNG, the terminal activities of LNG, and also the liquefaction of LNG,” said Gatchalian.
Interested LNG investors have been saying that a capital-intensive project, such as LNG, would require a clear direction from the government since investment in LNG is estimated to cost at least $1 billion.
Gatchalian said the LNG law must also require the presence of off-takers to ensure the long-term viability of the gas resource.
The DOE agrees. It said a law is needed to be created to ensure the success of the Philippine downstream natural gas rules crafted by the agency.