News Clipping

Browse the latest AEDS news in this page
Showing 10105 to 10112 of 10587
  • Renewables
11 December 2018

 – 

  • Malaysia

COMPANIES involved in generating electricity from sunlight will be back in action soon as the country’s much-anticipated, mouth-watering large-scale solar (LSS) programme will resume with a new round of open tender next year.

In a move to increase Malaysia’s power generation from renewable sources, the government recently announced that RM2 billion worth of projects under the third cycle of large-scale solar (LSS3) schemes will be dished out.

It is worth noting that LSS3 — with a total electricity generation capacity of 500mw — is in addition to LSS1 and LSS2 (a total of 958mw), which are scheduled to be realised by 2020.

Introduced in March 2016, LSS saw two rounds of competitive bidding conducted by the Energy Commission (EC).

Recall that for LSS1 and LSS2, companies that were awarded projects were Tenaga Nasional Bhd, Mudajaya Group Bhd, Cypark Resources Bhd and Hong Kong-listed BGMC International Ltd (see table).

To date, out of the total planned capacity of 958mw under LSS1 and LSS2, three projects with a total capacity of 32.5mw have reached the date of commercial operation. Other projects are expected to start generating power by end-2018 to 2020.

It is interesting to note that renewable energy (RE) constituted 2% of Malaysia’s total energy generation mix as at end-2016. The government hopes to increase this to 20% by 2025.

Energy, Science, Technology, Environment and Climate Change Minister Yeo Bee Yin has said the country would need to deploy 3,991mw of additional RE capacity to achieve that goal.

As Malaysia is expected to launch a 500mw solar power tender for LSS3 next year, what are solar energy players’ main challenges in meeting the government’s renewable energy target by 2025?

Industry experts The Edge spoke to point out that acquiring suitable land and a lack of economies of scale are among the major obstacles facing solar power plant developers.

This will have a negative multiplier effect on the downstream engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractors.

According to Pestech International Bhd CEO and executive director Paul Lim Pay Chuan, the biggest challenge for solar power plant developers is finding suitable tracts of land near the grid.

It is estimated that three acres of land are required to generate 1mw. In other words, a 30mw plant will need 100 acres and a 50mw plant, 150 acres.

“You cannot stack them up because every solar panel needs to be exposed to sunlight. If the plant is in a remote area, it is likely that the route to the grid will be long, so the investment in infrastructure will be high. It has to be near the grid, but then again, land is going to be expensive there,” Pay Chuan explains.

He says the cost of the land is the deciding factor, because every plant developer will have similar costs for the solar panels.

“Yes, Pestech may have a little advantage [on cost] because we are a power specialist, but still, the civil part (getting the land) is crucial,” he adds.

Pestech is mainly involved in four major business segments, namely power transmission infrastructure and products, power generation and rail electrification, build-and-operate transmission assets and embedded system software and product development.

Hoping to get a slice of the LSS3 project next year, the group is currently in talks with several local and foreign partners. Nevertheless, its priority is to acquire suitable land to build a solar farm with a capacity of between 30mw and 50mw.

“We are at the beginning stage. Given the new environment — as the government has said business players don’t need to know who, they only need to know how — Pestech is more confident of being at the front line of the tender. Since we know how to do it, we want to give it a try,” says Pay Chuan, who is of the view that solar energy generation is not a complicated business, provided suitable land is found.

“To be honest, the solar business is quite straightforward. It is basically just panels lined up, waiting for sunlight, converting DC (direct current) into AC (alternating current). It is much easier to operate than coal-fired or gas-fired power plants.”

He says RE has always been Pestech’s area of interest as the group has experience in solar farming. “Currently, we are doing infrastructure works for the LSS2 guys. We have not been a power plant developer. But now, we hope to find a partner and become a developer for LSS3.”

Meanwhile, BGMC International, which plans to build a 30mw solar power plant in Kuala Muda, Kedah, under LSS2, also expresses interest in participating in LSS3.

“We are definitely interested in LSS3. We have not found the land yet. The tender itself will take about six months. So, if the tender opens in January, we have to submit our tender by the June deadline,” says BGMC CEO Datuk Michael Teh.

BGMC is named after its founding chairman and executive director, Tan Sri Barry Goh Ming Choon. He is better known as the co-founder of property firm MCT Bhd, which is now controlled by Philippine property conglomerate Ayala Land Inc.

Over the years, BGMC has been involved in power transmission and distribution — one of its core businesses — and building infrastructure for the power industry, including substations and underground cabling.

Last December, BGMC and its joint-venture partner, Bras Venture Bhd, received a bid acceptance letter from the EC to develop the solar power plant in Kuala Muda, which is estimated to cost RM180 million to RM190 million, including the land.

“We are doing an evaluation of EPC contractors [for the Kuala Muda plant]. We are also working out the finances and funding of the plant. Our target is to get them done by March next year. By then, we should be able to commence construction,” says Teh.

Atlantic Blue Sdn Bhd, one of the front runners in the EPC tender for the Kuala Muda plant, is also eyeing LSS3 jobs.

Atlantic Blue — co-owned by Atlantic Blue Holdings Sdn Bhd (55%) and locally listed building material specialist Chin Hin Group Bhd (45%) — wholly owns Solarvest Energy Sdn Bhd, a solar system installer and service provider.

For perspective, Atlantic Blue is a homegrown turnkey EPC solution specialist that designs, procures, installs and commissions LSS projects, whereas Solarvest Energy focuses more on rooftop solar systems for residential, commercial and industrial areas.

“The LSS3 project is a great opportunity for us. We will see who is going to share the RM2 billion pie. We plan to make 20 submissions for our potential customers. Hopefully, of those submissions, at least eight can win,” says Atlantic Blue managing director Lim Chin Siu.

It is learnt that the planned 20 submissions are for a total of 300mw, which are estimated to be worth RM1 billion.

“If they (our potential customers) win, we need to tender for their jobs. By right, we should have a better chance to be appointed as their EPC contractor as we are helping them make submissions. But, of course, we will not win all,” says Chin Siu.

 

Financing issue

Currently, the LSS contracts are within the 1mw to 30mw range. The maximum capacity per project was scaled down from 50mw under LSS1 to 30mw under LSS2 as the government wants to encourage more companies to participate.

While the intention was good, solar power plant developers soon realised that financing was a problem. It is estimated that the investment per megawatt is about RM5 million to RM6 million. In other words, 30mw will require RM150 million to RM180 million.

“Based on feedback from the banks, 30mw is neither here nor there — it is too small for a bond, but slightly too big for a term loan. In terms of scaling, I think 50mw is just nice,” says BGMC’s Teh.

“You need a certain financial capability to kick off the projects. Without support from the financial industry and investment community, the whole thing cannot go.”

He says a bond is a good debt instrument as it gives stable exposure and long-term financing. Also, a bond issue would circumvent interest cost fluctuations.

“But the banks will always say your project scale is too small. Raising over RM150 million via a bond issuance is probably too small for banks. So, I think the EC should consider increasing the maximum capacity from 30mw to 50mw so that we have the right scale,” Teh says.

He adds that the coupon rate for a bond is pegged at the lower end of 6%, whereas the interest rate for a term loan is at the higher end of 6%, or even up to 8%. “Fortunately, if we have to go for a term loan, we still have the GTFS (Green Technology Financing Scheme) to knock it down.”

Under Budget 2019, it was announced that a RM2 billion GTFS will be made available, where the government will subsidise the interest cost by 2% for the first five years to incentivise investment in green technology.

Atlantic Blue director Edmund Tan Chyi Boon shares the same concern. “For a bond issuance, it has to be RM250 million to RM300 million. If your project is only RM150 million, the investment bank cannot do it for you. You may have to turn to corporate banking, but then again, RM150 million is probably too big for them. That is the problem. You are stuck in the middle.”

Solarvest Energy managing director Davis Chong says this is a concern not only to the developers but also to the downstream players.

“To put it bluntly, if the developers get a good investment return, we, as the EPC contractor, could enjoy a good margin as well. But if their investment return is tight, they might have to squeeze us,” he explains.

However, Pestech’s Pay Chuan remains unfazed, stating that in general, banks are still keen on local RE projects.

“You have a power purchase agreement with TNB, so the banks will not be rejecting RE financing. Even if they do, there are a lot of other funds or RE financing available worldwide,” he says.

“Of course, if you have no choice, you may have to settle for higher interest rates, which is still okay … it’s not a big issue at all. As the saying goes, you can’t have your cake and eat it too.”

  • Bioenergy
11 December 2018

 – 

  • Singapore

Ecogreen Energy, a subsidiary of listed CJE group, the global leaders in and waste-to-energy sector, has appointed Gupta as the

The decision of the change came during the board meeting held recently. He will be incharge of the day-to-day leadership of the Company and will also join Ecogreen’s Board of Directors.

Gupta has over a decade of experience in managing large organizations in sector across He has worked with many organizations across in key positions. He has created and managed many successful ventures in various sectors in India, UAE and

“I am very pleased to join and look forward to driving the development and execution of our strategy going forward. Our company is one of the largest companies in and our main focus will be to implement group vision and to bring our global experience, systems and know how to professionally manage the issue in We have an exceptionally talented team at that is focused on taking decisive actions to transform the current scenario and unlocking future growth opportunities. Waste is a big problem in the country and the company is committed to providing for managing it,” said Gupta.

“I’ve had the opportunity to watch Vishal grow as a over the last years and am convinced there is no better for in today. Vishal stands apart as a with an extraordinary ability to connect vision, people and ideas to drive strategy and execution. He is a seasoned leader with significant experience working with the waste management, operating efficiently at scale, and delivering value to shareholders,” said Charles Zhang, & MD.

Ecogreen currently, has three large Integrated Solid Projects in India, covering entire cities of Gurugram, Faridabad, and Ecogreen provides door to door waste collection service for over 2 million households, its to the landfill sites for further management. Recently there were a lot of complaints related to day to day operations of the company, especially waste collection.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

 

  • Renewables
11 December 2018

 – 

  • Indonesia

KATOWICE, Poland, Dec 11 2018 (IPS) – Although Indonesia has attained decent economic growth of over five percent in the last decade, in order to ensure sustainable growth in the future the switch to renewable energy (RE) will be critical, says the country’s government.
“If we don’t focus on low carbon development, we cannot continue this growth,” Bambang Brodjonegoro, Indonesia’s Minister of National Development Planning, said yesterday Dec. 10.

He spoke about Indonesia’s shift to a low carbon, climate-friendly development pathway at a high-level panel discussion at the 24th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP24), which is currently being held in Katowice, Poland. The panel discussion was organised by the Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI), in partnership with the Ministry of National Development Planning of the Republic of Indonesia (BAPPENAS).

The latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns of catastrophic climatic impacts if global warming is not kept below 1.5 degrees Celsius. This will include severe impact on food production and increasing risks of climate-related disasters.

But according to Brodjonegoro, the Indonesian government is taking this issue seriously.
“We are fully committed to steer our economy for low carbon development. We will mainstream a low carbon framework in our medium-term development plan,” he said, adding that low carbon development in Indonesia would involve improving environmental quality, attaining energy efficiency, increasing agriculture productivity, improving reforestation and reducing deforestation simultaneously.

There is a large scope for RE development in Indonesia, as most of its potential is unrealised as of now. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) report on Indonesia’s RE prospects, the country has “an estimated 716 GW of theoretical potential for renewable energy-based power generation”. But of its bioenergy potential of 32.7 GW, it has developed a mere 1.8 GW.

“In order to provide the electricity for remote areas, this is a good time to promote renewable energy as this will increase the percentage of renewable energy in our energy mix,” Brodjonegoro said.

According to the minister, a key issue for scaling up RE in Indonesia lies with developing the capacity of stakeholders to meet the needs of different types of investors to access finance.

Bambang Brodjonegoro, Indonesia’s Minister of National Development Planning, said the switch to renewable energy is critical for his country’s sustainable economic growth. He was speaking at a panel discussion held at COP24 in Katowice, Poland. Credit: Sohara Mehroze Shachi/IPS

Dr. Frank Rijsberman, Director General of GGGI, echoed these thoughts, stating that the critical factor for proliferating renewables in Indonesia is whether it can attract private sector investment.

“Both governments and the private sector have not fully incorporated the idea that green growth is not only nice but it is also affordable,” he said. “Businesses should be investing in renewable energy because there is a business opportunity.”
In this regard, he said that blended finance could be a critical path where every dollar investment from donors could catalyse other investments from private sources.

State Secretary for Climate and Environment in Norway Sveinung Rotevatn, was a panelist at the event. He stated that Norway is encouraged by the low carbon development in Indonesia, and is committing substantial funds to reduce deforestation there. According to Global Forest Watch, Indonesia experienced a drop in tree cover loss in 2017, including a 60 percent decline in primary forest loss. The organisaiton said that this could be in part to the 2016 government moratorium on the conversion of peatland.

“As a developed country we see [Norway] as having a responsibility to contribute,” he said. Norway has been working in partnership with Indonesia since 2010.

The future of oil is not bright, and Rotevatn believes the shift in production to gas from coal could be a useful bridge towards a shift to renewables in the long run. He added that resistance in this transition from fossil fuels to renewables is expected.

“In 1991 Norway introduced a carbon tax. Today we consider it a natural thing but implementing it is always hard,” he said. One estimate from the Norwegian environmental agency shows that since Norway reduced emissions in 1991 it continued healthy economic growth.

However, Indonesia has a long way to go in the transition process as over 90 percent of its energy still comes from fossil fuels. But the government is optimistic of its potential to scale up RE.

“We are focusing on incentivising renewable energy production and increasing infrastructure of renewable energy capacity. We have a lot of isolated islands and remote areas which can be utilised,” said Rida Mulyana, Director General of New, Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation (NREEC) at Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources.

However, he noted that several challenges remain. One of these is public acceptance, as there is still a need for systematic and sustainable socialisation and education to minimise community resistance to RE projects.

Moreover, affordability of the available clean energy remains an issue, and the cost needs to be reduced for renewables to be a viable option. This is exacerbated by the fact that liquified petroleum gas is still subsidised, which fosters Indonesia’s dependency on fossil fuels.

While Mulayana pointed out financing as a key issue, he also said the government will not provide any subsidy for renewables and it has to compete with other sources of energy.

David Kerins, Senior Energy Economist at the European Investment Bank and another panelist at the event, said although RE projects are becoming more commercially viable, the private sector is yet to jump in on these investment opportunities. So there is a need to promote investment while providing safeguards to investors on the expected benefits.

“The RE energy sector has moved far beyond the situation it was before. Once people see how possible and straight forward it is, private sector can start targeting projects of its own,” he said.

Glenn Pearce-Oroz, Director for Policy and Programmes, Sustainable Energy for All (SEforALL), one of the attendees of the event, said one of the important next steps will be how to bring along commercial financing for low carbon development.

“Part of what we are seeing is private sector being more and more interested to do business in the green economy. What they are looking for though is clarity of roles and consistency in terms of the markets they are getting into,” he said.

“So the challenge for developing countries is how do you demonstrate that type of consistency and clarity and how do you establish clear rules of the game, good regulatory frameworks, that gives private sector the confidence to come into these markets?” He said Indonesia has the size, dynamism of economy and a lot of favourable elements for attracting private sector investment.

“Green growth as a concept is beginning to take off in different countries,” said Dr. Saleemul Huq, Director of the International Centre for Climate Change and Development (ICCCAD) and a 24-time COP attendee.

“The most important element of any green growth strategy is to make sure it’s nationally determined and nationally owned,” he said, adding that modality of green growth is peculiar to the politics, socio economic conditions and culture of a country.

“Green growth is more of a political process than a technical process. There are vested interests and issues that have to be worked out at the national level,” he said. “The good news is it [green growth] has started to happen.”

 

  • This story has been published with support from Inter Press Service, the Stanley Foundation, Earth Journalism Network and Climate Change Media Partnership.
  • Renewables
11 December 2018

 – 

  • Indonesia

South Sumatra is officially recorded to have geothermal energy potential of up to 2,095 Megawatts, equivalent to 10% of the total geothermal potential in the country of 29 Gigawatts. This potential, according to the ESDM Director of Geothermal Energy, Trisnaldi, must be worked on and the results prioritized to meet the electricity needs of the people in South Sumatra.

“Electricity which will be produced from geothermal power plants (PLTP) is the priority for producing regions,” Trisnaldi said, during the inauguration of the inaugural PT Supreme Energy exploration well Rantau Dedap in Muara Enim District, some time ago

Trisnaldi explained, of the 39 new geothermal mining (WKP) working areas that have been signed by the government, only two blocks have begun exploration, namely the Muara Labo Block in West Sumatra and the Rantau Dedap Block in South Sumatra. The two blocks are managed by PT Supreme Energy.

Whereas according to data from the South Sumatra Mining and Energy Office, there are 6 geothermal locations that are being developed in this province. In addition to the Rantau Dedap Block, the Tanjung Sakti Block and the Empat Lawang Block will be managed by Turkish investors, Hitay Group. In addition there is the Lumut Balai Block managed by Pertamina Geothermal Energy which has explored with a potential of 2 x 55 MW. Beyond that there are still more Ranau Blocks and Rawas Blocks that have not been released.

During this time, in Indonesia, the use of energy substitute potential from these fossils encountered many problems, including licensing and overlapping of land, because the Geothermal WKP is in a forest with many protected forest statuses or reserves, which collide with the Law No. 41/1999 concerning forestry. One solution, of course, is to revise Law No. 27/2003 on geothermal energy, which is one of the main points related to the use of conservation forest for geothermal energy which has been still.

“Nearly 70% of geothermal locations are in conservation forests. While in the Forestry Law, mining activities cannot be carried out in conservation forest areas. So that it is indeed necessary to apply forest use loans for geothermal utilization. The rest, the project area is in production forests and protected forests that can use IPPKH, “said Trisnaldi.

The latest information, the Rantau Dedap Thermal Power Plant (PLTP) in Muara Enim Regency, Lahat Regency and Pagar Alam City, South Sumatra Province has entered the exploitation phase, marked by the taxation of RD-I3 wells which are the first exploitation wells on August 4, 2018 then, by the Director General of EBTKE at the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Rida Mulyana, accompanied by Director of Geothermal Energy, Ida Nuryatin Finahari.

The project of Rantau Dedap PLTP will provide additional state revenues in the form of Non-Tax State Revenues (PNBP) of US $ 106.87 million for the period of exploitation and utilization and other income with details; total exploration fees of US $ 626,460, total fixed contributions during exploitation and utilization (30 years) of US $ 4.25 million, PNBP production fees / royalties (assuming electricity generation of 681.9 GWh / year) of US $ 85 million during the period of exploitation and utilization, and from Production bonuses for the three districts (Muara Enim, Lahat and Pagar Alam) of US $ 17 million during the Production period. This state revenue does not include revenue from the tax sector.

The Rantau Dedap PLTP itself will be developed in 2 stages with an overall capacity of 220 MW. Phase I of 86 MW is planned to be COD in mid-2020 while phase 2 of 134 MW is targeted to COD in 2025. After operating, later the Rantau Dedap PLTP will be able to power more than 130 thousand houses. In addition, during the construction phase, the project will create 1,200 new jobs.

 

In South Sumatra, the potential of geothermal energy reaches up to 2,095 megawatts, equivalent to 10% of the country’s total geothermal energy. In 2012 PLN with a consortium consisting of PT Supreme Energy, GDF Suez and Marubeni Corporation collaborated to build the Rantau Dedap PLTP with a capacity of 2x110MW in Muara Enim Regency.

In addition, in Rantau Dedap, geothermal geothermal power plants are also located in Lumut Balai Village, namely PLTP Unit 1 and 2 with a capacity of 2×55 MW, and PLTP Lumut Balai units 3 and 4. projected in 2022 with a capacity of 110 MW. According to the Muara Enim Regency Mining and Energy Office, Pertamina Geothermal Energi has explored this Lumut Balai area and managed to find a reserve with a capacity of 60 MW.

Source: Kabar Serasan

  • Coal
  • Renewables
11 December 2018

 – 

  • Thailand

Thailand’s power-generating capacity will be deregulated in the near future, meaning the state-run Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (Egat) must compete with private firms at auctions for new large power plants, according to the tentative national power development plan (PDP). The latest version of the PDP is envisioned as the long-term development plan for the power industry over the next

two decades.

Public hearings on the revised PDP were held by energy policymakers last week in Chiang Mai, Khon Kaen, Surat Thani and Chon Buri.

The plan has been updated every few years, in 2010, 2012 and 2014, in line with economic and technological trends.

A source familiar with the matter said the new PDP will set targets along the same lines as the energy reform plan finalised in October. The goal is to let private firms compete with Egat in power generation.

But the business model of enhanced single buyer (ESB) has yet to change, and Egat remains the single buyer from all power-generating plants and distributes to end-users by itself.

“A change to the ESB model is not in the reform plan, so the policymakers don’t have a clear-cut policy to deregulate this model after the public hearings,” the source said.

Small power producers (SPPs), on the other hand, can sell their power directly to end-users, in compliance with the law.

In the coming years, policymakers will open up auctions to independent power producers (IPPs). Egat will no longer receive priority as the first bidder considered, but rather the state enterprise will take part in auctions alongside private IPPs.

Egat has enjoyed priority in the last 30 years in being granted most IPP licences and dominating the auctions.

In 2007, policymakers set a quota for Egat of 50% of total power-generating capacity in the country, but the figure has since fallen to 37%.

The PDP allows for IPP auctions at a combined capacity of 23,200 megawatts over the next two decades, with power-purchase cost among the top factors to be considered.

In terms of resources for power generation, the PDP aims for coal-fired power to contribute 12% of total capacity in the new version, down from 23% before.

Natural gas remains the workhorse at 53%, while renewable fuels’ share of 10% will increase to 20%. The remainder will be imported power from neighbouring countries.

Nuclear power is no longer part of the PDP. The previous plan put nuclear’s share at 5%.

Two planned coal-fired power plants in the South remain on the back burner amid local pushback. In the meantime, policymakers will used two gas-fired power generators at Egat’s Surat Thani operations to compensate for the shortage of power capacity in the region.

The two coal-fired plants would have a combined capacity of 2,800MW. Operations are likely to be delayed until 2023 and 2024 at the earliest.

The replacement capacity from Surat Thani is 1,400MW.

According to the Energy Policy and Planning Office (Eppo), the two coal-fired power plants have to finish a strategic environmental assessment, which may take some time, so the South needs reserve power capacity in the interim.

Meanwhile, the public has paid close attention to developments in the solar rooftop programme, which lets households sell back their surplus power output to state utilities.

A combined capacity of 10,000MW through 2037 is expected to go on stream under the Solar Prachachon programme, representing 20% of total power capacity.

The source said the revised PDP drafted by Eppo is nearly ready for the final stage of public hearings, with the office finalising some details before mandating the new PDP in early 2019.

Policymakers will launch the solar scheme at 100MW a year until 2023, increasing to 1,100MW-2,000MW until the end of the master plan.

  • Renewables
10 December 2018

 – 

  • Philippines

MANILA, Philippines — Ayala Corp., the country’s oldest conglomerate, is bent on aggressively growing its renewable energy portfolio to become an even bigger RE player in the country and beyond, its president and COO Fernando Zobel de Ayala told The STAR.

In an email interview, Zobel said the company’s renewable energy investments have been growing fast.

Thus, the company would continue to invest in this sector in the country and in Asia.

“As far as new businesses are concerned, we will be very focused on aggressively developing a renewable energy portfolio both in the Philippines and in the region. This has been one of our fastest growing new businesses,” Zobel said.

The company has been reducing its coal energy capacity.

In all, AC Energy, the power generation arm of Ayala, plans to develop an additional 800 megawatts (MW) of renewable energy projects in the country within five years.

In particular, the company is looking to build a portfolio of 600 MW of solar power and 200 MW of wind energy.

These are primarily greenfield projects.

The company has also been scaling up its international energy investments. It has investment in Vietnam comprising of 1,200 MW of solar and wind; in Indonesia with 400 MW of wind and solar.

With a required investment of up to $2 billion, AC Energy hopes to have more than 5,000 MW of power generation capacity by 2025.

It has over 1,200 MW of capacity. It has sold this year some of its coal assets to Aboitiz Power Corp.

At the same time, Zobel said, Ayala Corp. will continue to grow its current portfolio of businesses — real estate, banking, telco, and water which are all dominant players in their respective industries.

“We want to make sure this continues,” he said.

The conglomerate is also focusing on financial technology or fintech.

“We also have investments in fintech which will give many more Filipinos access to reliable and efficient payment systems as well as access to loans. There is also an ongoing digital transformation taking place throughout our whole organization to find more efficient ways of interacting with our customers, streamlining our processes and identifying potential new businesses,” Zobel said.

The company is also mindful of its businesses that have strong social impact.

“We are also focusing strongly on businesses with a strong social impact such as healthcare and education. We feel these are critical areas for our country,” he said.

Ayala in recent years has formed new businesses such as AC Health and AC Education as its health and education arms, respectively.

 

 

  • Renewables
10 December 2018

 – 

  • Philippines

In an article on sustainability, the overall urge to break the cycle and to establish a more stable and secure future through sustainable practices in business and society is being talked about in the context of the Philippines.

The country has been ranked among the top five countries at risk of the effects of climate variability in the past couple of decades, as reported in the Global Climate Risk Index. This can be seen in the weather disturbances with catastrophic natural disasters hitting the country in recent years.

The local Business Inquirer is taking geothermal leader and leading renewable energy company Energy Development Corporation (EDC) as an example describing it as having always been cognizant of the role that sustainable power generation plays in ensuring the long-term welfare of Filipinos, and more so in recent years as climate change has become not just a more imminent threat but already a harsh reality. As such, EDC has committed itself to powering a greener future through only cleaner sources of energy, primarily geothermal.

The commitment is remarkable in the overall picture of the Philippines energy sector, as coal is still the most prevalent source of power in the country. As of today, the Lopez Group of Companies, which owns EDC, is the only conglomerate int he Philippines to make a categorical declaration against coal.

EDC is also one of the pioneering companies in the Philippines that has achieved carbon-neutral operations, if not even the only one.  In 2017, EDC reported a carbon footprint of a little over 790,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), which is only around 22% of the carbon absorption of all the trees it has nurtured in its environmental drive in the past four decades—in effect, even making it a carbon negative enterprise, or what industry experts also term “climate positive.”

Energy Development Corp. sees geothermal energy as a key to a stable and baseload capacity form of energy helping the country to support a developing and growing economy. Utilising a natural and national resource, geothermal also provides clean, reliable and renewable energy around the clock year round, crucial for consumers, businesses and industries in the country.

Harnessing geothermal energy is also an act of harmony with the environment. The sites where EDC operates in are proof of the symbiosis between man and nature that is genuinely possible—communities of practice where health, safety, and local livelihood thrive in tune with the flourishing natural environment of forests and watershed.

Geothermal is perhaps the only clear solution to meeting today’s energy needs without mortgaging natural resources at the expense of future generations—effectively breaking the perilous downward spiral of destruction the world faces and paving the way for a sustainable energy future.

To show that this is not at all a new concept for EDC, here a presentation the company shared on the topic back in 2012.

  • Renewables
10 December 2018

 – 

  • Cambodia
  • Lao PDR
  • Myanmar
  • Thailand
  • Vietnam

The Mekong River, flowing from the Tibetan Plateau through Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam to the South China Sea, is a hotbed of ecological diversity. The roughly 60 million people who live in the region, many in poverty, depend on the river and its tributaries for food and income. But a surge in hydropower projects is threatening to plunge the Mekong River basin into catastrophic ecological collapse, hampering the flow of fish, nutrients and sediment, unless a viable alternative is found.

Enter Thomas Wild, Ph.D. ’14, who as an Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future Postdoctoral Fellow in Sustainability teamed up with Patrick Reed, professor of civil and environmental engineering, and the nonprofit, nongovernmental Natural Heritage Institute (NHI). Together, they worked with the Cambodian government to explore alternative options for the largest, most potentially devastating dam currently planned along the Mekong, in Sambor.

“The traditional hydropower planning paradigm is for developers to look for and select dam sites that are optimized for hydropower, and then figure out how to mitigate fishery impacts later,” Wild said. “We’ve turned that on its head by focusing on ecosystem concerns from the outset, beginning with site selection.”

Wild and Reed’s resulting study, “Balancing Hydropower Development and Ecological Impacts in the Mekong: Tradeoffs for Sambor Mega Dam,” was published this month in the Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management.

The proposed Sambor dam is an 11-mile long “chunk of concrete,” in Wild’s words, that would block a major migration highway that sees up to half a million fish every hour, heading to upstream tributaries to spawn or swimming downstream to critical nursery and fishery habitats in Tonle Sap Lake and the Mekong Delta. Eventually they reach the Vietnam Delta, which is already facing ecological strain from flooding and land loss due to rising sea levels.

To show the Cambodian government better options, Wild and Reed created a modeling platform that helped the team discover an alternative dam design, called the Sambor Ecological Alternative, with design and operational features that would improve sediment and fish passage while maintaining significant hydropower production. Collaborating with a broader interdisciplinary team that included fish biologists, a dam engineer, a geomorphologist, a geographer, a lawyer and an economist, the team explored alternative siting, design and operation choices, and the specific tradeoffs in balancing energy and ecological objectives that would result.

While the Sambor Ecological Alternative would still pose a significant risk to Mekong fisheries, it demonstrated to officials in the Cambodian government, including the prime minister, that other options exist.

“What we’ve done is show decision makers that there are a range of options available to them, each with different social, ecological and economic outcomes. We helped them define metrics that characterize these outcomes and objectives, and identify alternatives that may offer more balanced outcomes than the originally proposed dam,” said Wild, a visiting assistant research engineer at the Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center at the University of Maryland and a research scientist at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. “I think they’ve been more empowered to think about what their options are. ”

Since the NHI team presented their findings, the Cambodian government has been considering multiple alternatives to the original Sambor design and has expressed interest in building floating arrays of solar photovoltaic panels that would be economically viable and less disruptive to the ecosystem.

Wild and Reed hope to share their systems toolkit with other countries that have limited technical capacity but want to explore energy alternatives beyond what developers propose, allowing them to have a say in their own development.

“It’s easy to say the word alternative, but it’s not easy to generate them in a way that has sufficient salience and credibility to be relevant in a real decision-making context,” Reed said. “A lot of the complexity, nuances, uncertainty and sensitivity of these things, you have to be careful it doesn’t become an artificial mathematical exercise that is only academically interesting. It has to be integrated, interdisciplinary, and it has to have some actual relevance and legitimacy in complex real world decision contexts.”

User Dashboard

Back To ACE